Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
HC adjudicated a rent dispute involving a temple property, determining a retrospective rent enhancement of 15% from July 2016. The court calculated monthly rent progressively: from Rs. 1,08,059/- to Rs. 1,24,268/- (effective July 2016), then to Rs. 2,60,000/- (from March 2018), and subsequently to Rs. 2,99,000/- (from March 2021). The temple's claimed arrears of Rs. 32,74,753/- were partially acknowledged. The court directed the temple to treat previous payments as full settlement, with no further amounts payable to the bank, and recommended the temple pursue potential tax refunds through appropriate legal channels.
HC adjudicated a rent dispute involving a temple property, determining a retrospective rent enhancement of 15% from July 2016. The court calculated monthly rent progressively: from Rs. 1,08,059/- to Rs. 1,24,268/- (effective July 2016), then to Rs. 2,60,000/- (from March 2018), and subsequently to Rs. 2,99,000/- (from March 2021). The temple's claimed arrears of Rs. 32,74,753/- were partially acknowledged. The court directed the temple to treat previous payments as full settlement, with no further amounts payable to the bank, and recommended the temple pursue potential tax refunds through appropriate legal channels.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
