Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
CESTAT held that the extended period of limitation was wrongly invoked in the first show cause notice. The service tax demand on amounts received from foreign counterparts under reverse charge mechanism is upheld within the normal limitation period. The appellant's incorrect understanding of tax law was deemed a reasonable cause. All penalties were set aside under section 80. The appeal was partially allowed, with the matter remanded to the Commissioner for calculating and appropriating tax and interest payments already made.
CESTAT held that the extended period of limitation was wrongly invoked in the first show cause notice. The service tax demand on amounts received from foreign counterparts under reverse charge mechanism is upheld within the normal limitation period. The appellant's incorrect understanding of tax law was deemed a reasonable cause. All penalties were set aside under section 80. The appeal was partially allowed, with the matter remanded to the Commissioner for calculating and appropriating tax and interest payments already made.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.