Opportunity to furnish unsecured-loan confirmations is required before reassessment initiation; proceedings require fresh consideration after taxpayer...
Under-reporting on a first reassessment return attracts penalty, while enhanced misreporting penalty requires proof of a statutory misreporting catego...
NCLAT upheld the moratorium provisions under IBC, finding that payments made by the appellant after CIRP commencement were unauthorized. The tribunal conclusively ruled that the suspended management cannot unilaterally deploy corporate funds without IRP authorization, even if claiming ordinary business operations. The court determined that Rs. 11.01 Cr transferred through nine RTGS and three cheque payments breached statutory moratorium. Consequently, the appellant and respondents were held jointly and severally liable to refund the unauthorized transactions, with the appeal being summarily dismissed.
NCLAT upheld the moratorium provisions under IBC, finding that payments made by the appellant after CIRP commencement were unauthorized. The tribunal conclusively ruled that the suspended management cannot unilaterally deploy corporate funds without IRP authorization, even if claiming ordinary business operations. The court determined that Rs. 11.01 Cr transferred through nine RTGS and three cheque payments breached statutory moratorium. Consequently, the appellant and respondents were held jointly and severally liable to refund the unauthorized transactions, with the appeal being summarily dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
