Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
NCLAT upheld the moratorium provisions under IBC, finding that payments made by the appellant after CIRP commencement were unauthorized. The tribunal conclusively ruled that the suspended management cannot unilaterally deploy corporate funds without IRP authorization, even if claiming ordinary business operations. The court determined that Rs. 11.01 Cr transferred through nine RTGS and three cheque payments breached statutory moratorium. Consequently, the appellant and respondents were held jointly and severally liable to refund the unauthorized transactions, with the appeal being summarily dismissed.
NCLAT upheld the moratorium provisions under IBC, finding that payments made by the appellant after CIRP commencement were unauthorized. The tribunal conclusively ruled that the suspended management cannot unilaterally deploy corporate funds without IRP authorization, even if claiming ordinary business operations. The court determined that Rs. 11.01 Cr transferred through nine RTGS and three cheque payments breached statutory moratorium. Consequently, the appellant and respondents were held jointly and severally liable to refund the unauthorized transactions, with the appeal being summarily dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.