Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of ITAT ruled that multiple proposed comparables were inappropriate for transfer pricing analysis due to fundamental differences in business models, product types, and operational characteristics. The tribunal systematically rejected comparables from various retail, textile, and fashion companies, emphasizing that the appellant's felt packaging material business significantly differs from the proposed comparables' core operations. The key considerations included divergent revenue sources, product nature, market dynamics, and functional profiles. The tribunal concluded that none of the suggested companies could serve as valid comparables for transfer pricing determination, thereby maintaining the arm's length principle in assessing international transaction pricing.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
