Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
AT determined appellant's property was proceeds of crime under PMLA, arising from NSEL fraud scheme. Evidence established appellant's spouse was a senior NSEL executive involved in systematic financial manipulation, with property purchased using fraudulently obtained consultancy charges. Despite appellant's claims of legitimate income, the tribunal found her defense unsubstantiated and concluded the property was directly linked to criminal proceeds. The tribunal rejected appellant's arguments regarding property valuation and lack of predicate offense chargesheet, confirming full property attachment. Appeal was consequently dismissed, upholding the original attachment order.
AT determined appellant's property was proceeds of crime under PMLA, arising from NSEL fraud scheme. Evidence established appellant's spouse was a senior NSEL executive involved in systematic financial manipulation, with property purchased using fraudulently obtained consultancy charges. Despite appellant's claims of legitimate income, the tribunal found her defense unsubstantiated and concluded the property was directly linked to criminal proceeds. The tribunal rejected appellant's arguments regarding property valuation and lack of predicate offense chargesheet, confirming full property attachment. Appeal was consequently dismissed, upholding the original attachment order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
