Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
ITAT held that the assessee adequately explained cash deposits during demonetization through documented cash sales, which constituted 3.06% of total sales. The Assessing Officer did not identify any defects in the books of accounts or sales records. Complete documentation including purchase bills, sales vouchers, and ledger accounts were submitted. The tribunal found no infirmity in CIT(A)'s findings and decided in favor of the assessee. The protective addition was remanded back to CIT(A) to be heard alongside the appeal of the related company. Revenue's appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.
ITAT held that the assessee adequately explained cash deposits during demonetization through documented cash sales, which constituted 3.06% of total sales. The Assessing Officer did not identify any defects in the books of accounts or sales records. Complete documentation including purchase bills, sales vouchers, and ledger accounts were submitted. The tribunal found no infirmity in CIT(A)'s findings and decided in favor of the assessee. The protective addition was remanded back to CIT(A) to be heard alongside the appeal of the related company. Revenue's appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
