Embezzlement losses in charitable institutions remain allowable when misappropriation is established, irrecoverable, and not a specified-person benefi...
National long-distance undertaking status supports deduction where separately licensed infrastructure, resources, revenue, and expenditure establish c...
Agency reimbursement income follows contractual deposit-liability computation, while pending deposit collections do not constitute deemed-dividend loa...
Membership-consent thresholds for oppression petitions are satisfied by unchallenged voter-list consents, while unsupported forgery claims require pro...
HC finds that lower authorities failed to adequately examine critical evidence regarding input tax credit (ITC) claim. Despite supplier's subsequent registration cancellation, registration was valid during relevant period. Authorities did not conclusively determine supplier's tax compliance or verify actual goods movement. The court set aside both original and appellate orders, remanding the matter to the adjudicating authority for comprehensive re-examination of documentary evidence and substantive compliance with GST Act provisions, thereby allowing petitioner an opportunity to substantiate ITC claim through proper procedural review.
HC finds that lower authorities failed to adequately examine critical evidence regarding input tax credit (ITC) claim. Despite supplier's subsequent registration cancellation, registration was valid during relevant period. Authorities did not conclusively determine supplier's tax compliance or verify actual goods movement. The court set aside both original and appellate orders, remanding the matter to the adjudicating authority for comprehensive re-examination of documentary evidence and substantive compliance with GST Act provisions, thereby allowing petitioner an opportunity to substantiate ITC claim through proper procedural review.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4881 
