Blocked input tax credit for resort construction remains unavailable; interest follows actual utilisation, while delayed payment attracts statutory pe...
Duplicate PAN allocation requires record verification and deactivation reasons before assessment-related transactions can be attributed to an assessee...
Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required...
HC finds that lower authorities failed to adequately examine critical evidence regarding input tax credit (ITC) claim. Despite supplier's subsequent registration cancellation, registration was valid during relevant period. Authorities did not conclusively determine supplier's tax compliance or verify actual goods movement. The court set aside both original and appellate orders, remanding the matter to the adjudicating authority for comprehensive re-examination of documentary evidence and substantive compliance with GST Act provisions, thereby allowing petitioner an opportunity to substantiate ITC claim through proper procedural review.
HC finds that lower authorities failed to adequately examine critical evidence regarding input tax credit (ITC) claim. Despite supplier's subsequent registration cancellation, registration was valid during relevant period. Authorities did not conclusively determine supplier's tax compliance or verify actual goods movement. The court set aside both original and appellate orders, remanding the matter to the adjudicating authority for comprehensive re-examination of documentary evidence and substantive compliance with GST Act provisions, thereby allowing petitioner an opportunity to substantiate ITC claim through proper procedural review.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
