Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
NCLAT dismissed the appeal, finding the delay of 2659 days in filing the appeal was unjustifiable and beyond the statutorily prescribed 90-day limitation period. The tribunal held that the appellant failed to demonstrate sufficient cause for the extensive delay, noting a lack of diligence in tracking proceedings and missing critical procedural timelines. The application for condonation of delay was rejected, emphasizing the appellant's responsibility to maintain procedural punctuality and timely pursue legal remedies within the prescribed statutory framework.
NCLAT dismissed the appeal, finding the delay of 2659 days in filing the appeal was unjustifiable and beyond the statutorily prescribed 90-day limitation period. The tribunal held that the appellant failed to demonstrate sufficient cause for the extensive delay, noting a lack of diligence in tracking proceedings and missing critical procedural timelines. The application for condonation of delay was rejected, emphasizing the appellant's responsibility to maintain procedural punctuality and timely pursue legal remedies within the prescribed statutory framework.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
