https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88767 NCLAT dismissed the appeal, finding the delay of 2659 days in filing the appeal was unjustifiable and beyond the statutorily prescribed 90-day limitation period. The tribunal held that the appellant failed to demonstrate sufficient cause for the extensive delay, noting a lack of diligence in tracking proceedings and missing critical procedural timelines. The application for condonation of delay was rejected, emphasizing the appellant's responsibility to maintain procedural punctuality and timely pursue legal remedies within the prescribed statutory framework. en-us Tue, 27 May 2025 08:32:47 +0530 Tue, 27 May 2025 08:32:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88767 NCLAT dismissed the appeal, finding the delay of 2659 days in filing the appeal was unjustifiable and beyond the statutorily prescribed 90-day limitation period. The tribunal held that the appellant failed to demonstrate sufficient cause for the extensive delay, noting a lack of diligence in tracking proceedings and missing critical procedural timelines. The application for condonation of delay was rejected, emphasizing the appellant's responsibility to maintain procedural punctuality and timely pursue legal remedies within the prescribed statutory framework. Highlights Companies Law Tue, 27 May 2025 08:32:47 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=88767