Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
CESTAT allowed the appeal challenging customs confiscation of numismatic coin collection. The tribunal determined the goods were personal baggage, not commercial items or antiques, and found no misdeclaration. The confiscation order was set aside, with directions that the appellant may clear the goods by paying applicable customs duties and subject to existing baggage import regulations. The ruling emphasized the collection's status as personal property and rejected the original administrative order's characterization of the items as prohibited or antique goods.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.