Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
HC upheld the seizure of imported polyurethane waste materials under Section 11, determining that the goods classified as waste, parings, and scrap of polyurethanes (CTI 39159063) fall within the restricted import category. The court found no procedural error in the seizure, specifically noting that the imported materials including top skin, bottom skin, side skin, shreddings, and trimmings of polyurethane foam constitute restricted waste materials. Consequently, the writ petition challenging the seizure memorandum was dismissed, affirming the respondents' administrative action.
HC upheld the seizure of imported polyurethane waste materials under Section 11, determining that the goods classified as waste, parings, and scrap of polyurethanes (CTI 39159063) fall within the restricted import category. The court found no procedural error in the seizure, specifically noting that the imported materials including top skin, bottom skin, side skin, shreddings, and trimmings of polyurethane foam constitute restricted waste materials. Consequently, the writ petition challenging the seizure memorandum was dismissed, affirming the respondents' administrative action.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.