Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
AT adjudicated a foreign exchange contravention case involving unauthorized receipt of funds from outside India. The tribunal found violations under Sections 3(c) and 3(d) of the 1999 Act based on documentary evidence and corroborated statements. The original penalties of Rs. 9 crore and Rs. 1 crore were substantially reduced to Rs. 2.75 crore and Rs. 25 lakhs respectively, considering the case's age. The tribunal directed respondent to adjust Rs. 1 crore from the confiscated amount of Rs. 1,10,95,000, with excess funds to be returned to the appellant. The appellant's prior deposit of Rs. 90 lakhs and bank guarantee of Rs. 1.10 crore were also considered in the final disposition.
AT adjudicated a foreign exchange contravention case involving unauthorized receipt of funds from outside India. The tribunal found violations under Sections 3(c) and 3(d) of the 1999 Act based on documentary evidence and corroborated statements. The original penalties of Rs. 9 crore and Rs. 1 crore were substantially reduced to Rs. 2.75 crore and Rs. 25 lakhs respectively, considering the case's age. The tribunal directed respondent to adjust Rs. 1 crore from the confiscated amount of Rs. 1,10,95,000, with excess funds to be returned to the appellant. The appellant's prior deposit of Rs. 90 lakhs and bank guarantee of Rs. 1.10 crore were also considered in the final disposition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
