Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
ITAT resolved a tax dispute involving a UK-based engineering consultancy firm's income from services rendered in India. The Tribunal determined that payments received for consulting engineering services constitute business income under Article 7 of India-UK DTAA, not Fees for Technical Services (FTS). Since the company lacked a Permanent Establishment in India, the income was deemed non-taxable in India. The Tribunal upheld the assessee's position, consistent with its prior decisions in similar cases, and allowed the appeal, effectively exempting the income from Indian taxation.
ITAT resolved a tax dispute involving a UK-based engineering consultancy firm's income from services rendered in India. The Tribunal determined that payments received for consulting engineering services constitute business income under Article 7 of India-UK DTAA, not Fees for Technical Services (FTS). Since the company lacked a Permanent Establishment in India, the income was deemed non-taxable in India. The Tribunal upheld the assessee's position, consistent with its prior decisions in similar cases, and allowed the appeal, effectively exempting the income from Indian taxation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.