Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether receipts from consulting engineering services and management fees/common cost recharge were taxable in India as fees for technical services under the India-UK tax treaty and the Income-tax Act, and whether, in the absence of a permanent establishment, such receipts could be taxed in India as business income.
Analysis: The Tribunal followed its earlier orders in the assessee's own case and held that the services rendered did not result in making available technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how, or processes to the Indian recipient. The receipts from consulting engineering services were therefore not covered by the treaty definition of fees for technical services. The Tribunal further held that the management fees and common cost recharge were ancillary to the same service arrangement and could not be taxed on a different footing. In the absence of a permanent establishment in India, the receipts were held to be business profits under Article 7 and not taxable in India.
Conclusion: The receipts were not taxable as fees for technical services or royalty, and the additions were deleted in favour of the assessee.