PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
HC held that no draft penalty order was generated under faceless assessment mechanism as required u/s 144B. The demand notice u/s 156 was improperly communicated, rendering the refund adjustment u/s 245 illegal. The court quashed the refund adjustment and remanded the matter, directing respondents to permit petitioner to file reply to show cause notice u/s 271(1)(c), generate draft penalty order after considering objections, and provide opportunity of hearing if requested.
HC held that no draft penalty order was generated under faceless assessment mechanism as required u/s 144B. The demand notice u/s 156 was improperly communicated, rendering the refund adjustment u/s 245 illegal. The court quashed the refund adjustment and remanded the matter, directing respondents to permit petitioner to file reply to show cause notice u/s 271(1)(c), generate draft penalty order after considering objections, and provide opportunity of hearing if requested.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.