Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
HC held that no draft penalty order was generated under faceless assessment mechanism as required u/s 144B. The demand notice u/s 156 was improperly communicated, rendering the refund adjustment u/s 245 illegal. The court quashed the refund adjustment and remanded the matter, directing respondents to permit petitioner to file reply to show cause notice u/s 271(1)(c), generate draft penalty order after considering objections, and provide opportunity of hearing if requested.
HC held that no draft penalty order was generated under faceless assessment mechanism as required u/s 144B. The demand notice u/s 156 was improperly communicated, rendering the refund adjustment u/s 245 illegal. The court quashed the refund adjustment and remanded the matter, directing respondents to permit petitioner to file reply to show cause notice u/s 271(1)(c), generate draft penalty order after considering objections, and provide opportunity of hearing if requested.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
