TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of HC held that no draft penalty order was generated under faceless assessment mechanism as required u/s 144B. The demand notice u/s 156 was improperly communicated, rendering the refund adjustment u/s 245 illegal. The court quashed the refund adjustment and remanded the matter, directing respondents to permit petitioner to file reply to show cause notice u/s 271(1)(c), generate draft penalty order after considering objections, and provide opportunity of hearing if requested.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
