Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
HC held that the communication dated 29 November 2018 was a preliminary, non-conclusive communication regarding a potential tax refund and not a statutory order. While quashing the impugned communication dated 16 June 2022, the court directed the tax authority to pass a final order determining the refund claim within eight weeks, providing the petitioner an opportunity to be heard, with all substantive contentions remaining open for consideration.
HC held that the communication dated 29 November 2018 was a preliminary, non-conclusive communication regarding a potential tax refund and not a statutory order. While quashing the impugned communication dated 16 June 2022, the court directed the tax authority to pass a final order determining the refund claim within eight weeks, providing the petitioner an opportunity to be heard, with all substantive contentions remaining open for consideration.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
