Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
HC held that under SARFAESI Act, the liability of mortgagor is distinct from the borrower in determining pre-deposit amount. The court clarified that when a borrower raises objections to a secured creditor's notice, the creditor's response can be considered in calculating the debt due. The statutory provisions mandate the secured creditor to consider and communicate responses to borrower representations. The court directed DRAT to reassess the pre-deposit amount by considering the petitioner's reply and bank's rejoinder, effectively quashing the previous order and allowing the petition in part.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.