Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
HC determined that initiating an investigation under Section 11-C of SEBI Act requires demonstrable reasonable grounds. The court found insufficient substantive evidence to warrant the investigation, as the appointing authority merely reiterated withdrawn allegations without comprehensive supporting documentation. Internal notings remained unapproved by the Executive Director, and no compelling circumstances justified a suo motu investigation. The order was deemed arbitrary and unreasonable, lacking the requisite legal threshold for initiating regulatory proceedings against the petitioner entity.
HC determined that initiating an investigation under Section 11-C of SEBI Act requires demonstrable reasonable grounds. The court found insufficient substantive evidence to warrant the investigation, as the appointing authority merely reiterated withdrawn allegations without comprehensive supporting documentation. Internal notings remained unapproved by the Executive Director, and no compelling circumstances justified a suo motu investigation. The order was deemed arbitrary and unreasonable, lacking the requisite legal threshold for initiating regulatory proceedings against the petitioner entity.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
