Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
ITAT held that the transfer pricing order dated 12.01.2015 merged into the final assessment order dated 20.04.2015 for AY 2011-12 was quashed by CIT(A) as being passed in a non-existent entity's name. Consequently, the extended 12-month time limit for passing the final assessment order was invalid. The assessment order dated 12.05.2015 was beyond the prescribed limitation period of 31.03.2015. The tribunal ruled that the impugned order under section 143(3) read with section 144C was time-barred and liable to be quashed, thereby allowing the assessee's challenge to the order's validity.
ITAT held that the transfer pricing order dated 12.01.2015 merged into the final assessment order dated 20.04.2015 for AY 2011-12 was quashed by CIT(A) as being passed in a non-existent entity's name. Consequently, the extended 12-month time limit for passing the final assessment order was invalid. The assessment order dated 12.05.2015 was beyond the prescribed limitation period of 31.03.2015. The tribunal ruled that the impugned order under section 143(3) read with section 144C was time-barred and liable to be quashed, thereby allowing the assessee's challenge to the order's validity.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
