Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
ITAT adjudicated a tax assessment reopening dispute, holding that revenue's attempt to extend limitation period through reminder communications was invalid. The tribunal rejected revenue's contention regarding 14-day response timeline, finding it inconsistent with judicial precedent. The assessment order was quashed as the section 148A(d) order and section 148 notice were issued beyond the prescribed limitation period. The tribunal determined that without a valid notice, the assessment order dated 30.05.2023 could not be sustained. The decision was rendered in favor of the assessee, effectively nullifying the tax department's reassessment proceedings due to procedural non-compliance with statutory timelines.
ITAT adjudicated a tax assessment reopening dispute, holding that revenue's attempt to extend limitation period through reminder communications was invalid. The tribunal rejected revenue's contention regarding 14-day response timeline, finding it inconsistent with judicial precedent. The assessment order was quashed as the section 148A(d) order and section 148 notice were issued beyond the prescribed limitation period. The tribunal determined that without a valid notice, the assessment order dated 30.05.2023 could not be sustained. The decision was rendered in favor of the assessee, effectively nullifying the tax department's reassessment proceedings due to procedural non-compliance with statutory timelines.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
