Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
- βοΈ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- π Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws β


Just a moment...
Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws β


Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
HC determined that the petitioner-bank's security interest, registered with CERSAI on 09/07/2011 prior to the tax authority's attachment order on 02/02/2015, takes precedence under Section 26-E of SARFAESI Act. The tax authorities failed to register their attachment order or provide sufficient notice, rendering their claim invalid. Consequently, the bank's e-auction sale to the respondent was upheld, granting clear title to the secured asset free from any encumbrances claimed by the tax authorities. The petition was allowed, establishing the bank's priority over the state's dues.