Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
HC held that the eviction notice under Section 8(4) of PMLA is valid and within jurisdiction. The court found that non-compliance with Rule 5(1) does not vitiate the notice under Rule 5(2), as these provisions serve different purposes. The lack of a mandatory time limit for issuing the notice does not invalidate it. The court directed the Appellate Tribunal to expeditiously hear the petitioner's appeal and stay application within two months, effectively dismissing the petitioner's challenge as premature given the pending appeal.
HC held that the eviction notice under Section 8(4) of PMLA is valid and within jurisdiction. The court found that non-compliance with Rule 5(1) does not vitiate the notice under Rule 5(2), as these provisions serve different purposes. The lack of a mandatory time limit for issuing the notice does not invalidate it. The court directed the Appellate Tribunal to expeditiously hear the petitioner's appeal and stay application within two months, effectively dismissing the petitioner's challenge as premature given the pending appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
