Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
In a dispute over taxable service value for works contracts involving goods and services, CESTAT resolved the valuation controversy. The tribunal affirmed the assessee's method of calculating service tax, where 85% was attributed to goods value and 15% to service component. The decision validated the invoiced value and confirmed VAT payment on goods portion. Relying on prior judicial precedent, the tribunal held that once VAT is paid according to state statutory provisions, the service value cannot be challenged. The appeal was ultimately dismissed, upholding the adjudicating authority's original determination of tax liability based on documentary evidence including chartered accountant certificates.
In a dispute over taxable service value for works contracts involving goods and services, CESTAT resolved the valuation controversy. The tribunal affirmed the assessee's method of calculating service tax, where 85% was attributed to goods value and 15% to service component. The decision validated the invoiced value and confirmed VAT payment on goods portion. Relying on prior judicial precedent, the tribunal held that once VAT is paid according to state statutory provisions, the service value cannot be challenged. The appeal was ultimately dismissed, upholding the adjudicating authority's original determination of tax liability based on documentary evidence including chartered accountant certificates.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
