Institutional client call-recording exemption lets research analysts retain alternative verifiable interaction records while maintaining broader clien...
Article 21 safeguards against punitive money-laundering detention when trial delay makes continued custody constitutionally disproportionate despite s...
ITAT adjudicated a case involving reopening of assessment under section 147, addressing two primary legal issues. First, regarding notice issuance post-1-04-2021, the tribunal held that prior approval from the competent authority under section 151 was mandatory. The AO's notice was deemed invalid as procedural requirements were not strictly followed. Second, concerning share transaction allegations, the tribunal ruled against revenue, determining that reassessment proceedings constituted a change of opinion since all material was previously examined during original assessment. The tribunal found the reopening of assessment invalid, effectively deciding in favor of the assessee and against revenue's claims of bogus share transactions.
ITAT adjudicated a case involving reopening of assessment under section 147, addressing two primary legal issues. First, regarding notice issuance post-1-04-2021, the tribunal held that prior approval from the competent authority under section 151 was mandatory. The AO's notice was deemed invalid as procedural requirements were not strictly followed. Second, concerning share transaction allegations, the tribunal ruled against revenue, determining that reassessment proceedings constituted a change of opinion since all material was previously examined during original assessment. The tribunal found the reopening of assessment invalid, effectively deciding in favor of the assessee and against revenue's claims of bogus share transactions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
