<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Legal Battle: Mandatory Prior Approval Invalidates Tax Reassessment Notice Under Section 147, Blocking Revenue&#039;s Claim of Bogus Transactions</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=87675</link>
    <description>ITAT adjudicated a case involving reopening of assessment under section 147, addressing two primary legal issues. First, regarding notice issuance post-1-04-2021, the tribunal held that prior approval from the competent authority under section 151 was mandatory. The AO&#039;s notice was deemed invalid as procedural requirements were not strictly followed. Second, concerning share transaction allegations, the tribunal ruled against revenue, determining that reassessment proceedings constituted a change of opinion since all material was previously examined during original assessment. The tribunal found the reopening of assessment invalid, effectively deciding in favor of the assessee and against revenue&#039;s claims of bogus share transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 09:09:34 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 09:09:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=816596" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Legal Battle: Mandatory Prior Approval Invalidates Tax Reassessment Notice Under Section 147, Blocking Revenue&#039;s Claim of Bogus Transactions</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=87675</link>
      <description>ITAT adjudicated a case involving reopening of assessment under section 147, addressing two primary legal issues. First, regarding notice issuance post-1-04-2021, the tribunal held that prior approval from the competent authority under section 151 was mandatory. The AO&#039;s notice was deemed invalid as procedural requirements were not strictly followed. Second, concerning share transaction allegations, the tribunal ruled against revenue, determining that reassessment proceedings constituted a change of opinion since all material was previously examined during original assessment. The tribunal found the reopening of assessment invalid, effectively deciding in favor of the assessee and against revenue&#039;s claims of bogus share transactions.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 09:09:34 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=87675</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>