Blocked input tax credit for resort construction remains unavailable; interest follows actual utilisation, while delayed payment attracts statutory pe...
Duplicate PAN allocation requires record verification and deactivation reasons before assessment-related transactions can be attributed to an assessee...
Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required...
HC determined that the petitioner seeks refund of IGST paid on export goods, with a representation submitted on 03.10.2022 pending consideration. The court directs the petitioner to submit a copy of the representation to the 2nd respondent within 2 weeks of receiving the order. The petition is disposed of, mandating administrative review of the refund claim and providing procedural guidance for further action on the IGST refund request.
HC determined that the petitioner seeks refund of IGST paid on export goods, with a representation submitted on 03.10.2022 pending consideration. The court directs the petitioner to submit a copy of the representation to the 2nd respondent within 2 weeks of receiving the order. The petition is disposed of, mandating administrative review of the refund claim and providing procedural guidance for further action on the IGST refund request.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.