Electricity network contributions remain revenue expenditure where ownership and maintenance stay with the electricity board, supporting business prof...
HC allowed the Petitioner's appeal, setting aside the Impugned Order-in-Appeal and Rectification Order. The court found that Respondent No. 2 violated principles of natural justice by rejecting the appeal without considering the submitted Power of Attorney and without providing an opportunity to cure procedural defects. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration, with the Petitioner directed to submit self-certified document copies within two weeks. The decision emphasizes procedural fairness and the opportunity to rectify technical non-compliances in administrative appeals under CGST Act, 2017.
HC allowed the Petitioner's appeal, setting aside the Impugned Order-in-Appeal and Rectification Order. The court found that Respondent No. 2 violated principles of natural justice by rejecting the appeal without considering the submitted Power of Attorney and without providing an opportunity to cure procedural defects. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration, with the Petitioner directed to submit self-certified document copies within two weeks. The decision emphasizes procedural fairness and the opportunity to rectify technical non-compliances in administrative appeals under CGST Act, 2017.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
