<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Procedural Fairness Prevails: Appeal Reinstated After Violation of Natural Justice Principles in Administrative Proceedings</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=87330</link>
    <description>HC allowed the Petitioner&#039;s appeal, setting aside the Impugned Order-in-Appeal and Rectification Order. The court found that Respondent No. 2 violated principles of natural justice by rejecting the appeal without considering the submitted Power of Attorney and without providing an opportunity to cure procedural defects. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration, with the Petitioner directed to submit self-certified document copies within two weeks. The decision emphasizes procedural fairness and the opportunity to rectify technical non-compliances in administrative appeals under CGST Act, 2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 08:32:54 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 08:32:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=813297" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Procedural Fairness Prevails: Appeal Reinstated After Violation of Natural Justice Principles in Administrative Proceedings</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=87330</link>
      <description>HC allowed the Petitioner&#039;s appeal, setting aside the Impugned Order-in-Appeal and Rectification Order. The court found that Respondent No. 2 violated principles of natural justice by rejecting the appeal without considering the submitted Power of Attorney and without providing an opportunity to cure procedural defects. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration, with the Petitioner directed to submit self-certified document copies within two weeks. The decision emphasizes procedural fairness and the opportunity to rectify technical non-compliances in administrative appeals under CGST Act, 2017.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 08:32:54 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=87330</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>