Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
HC dismisses petition regarding vicarious liability under Section 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act. The court upheld that a former director cannot be held criminally responsible for cheque dishonour after her resignation, absent specific evidence of continued control or involvement in company affairs. The ruling emphasizes that mere prior association or familial connections are insufficient to establish vicarious liability. The court found no material demonstrating the director's consent, connivance, or neglect in cheque issuance, thereby rejecting criminal proceedings against her under Sections 138 and 141 of the NI Act.
HC dismisses petition regarding vicarious liability under Section 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act. The court upheld that a former director cannot be held criminally responsible for cheque dishonour after her resignation, absent specific evidence of continued control or involvement in company affairs. The ruling emphasizes that mere prior association or familial connections are insufficient to establish vicarious liability. The court found no material demonstrating the director's consent, connivance, or neglect in cheque issuance, thereby rejecting criminal proceedings against her under Sections 138 and 141 of the NI Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
