PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal regarding capital gains tax on land sale, setting aside both the AO's and CIT(A)'s orders. The dispute centered on whether the land qualified as a "capital asset" under s. 2(14), specifically whether it was situated within municipal limits of Sardarsahar. The Tribunal found that revenue authorities failed to properly consider the Rajasthan State Gazette dated 14.07.1988, which established boundary limits under the Rajasthan Nagar Palika Act, 1959. A subsequent letter dated 04.04.2019 clarified that the land was outside municipal limits, contradicting the earlier letter relied upon by the AO. The ITAT held that the tax authorities failed to discharge their evidentiary burden on this crucial jurisdictional fact.
The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal regarding capital gains tax on land sale, setting aside both the AO's and CIT(A)'s orders. The dispute centered on whether the land qualified as a "capital asset" under s. 2(14), specifically whether it was situated within municipal limits of Sardarsahar. The Tribunal found that revenue authorities failed to properly consider the Rajasthan State Gazette dated 14.07.1988, which established boundary limits under the Rajasthan Nagar Palika Act, 1959. A subsequent letter dated 04.04.2019 clarified that the land was outside municipal limits, contradicting the earlier letter relied upon by the AO. The ITAT held that the tax authorities failed to discharge their evidentiary burden on this crucial jurisdictional fact.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
