Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The SC held that under the Arbitration Act, 1940, a contractual clause barring interest claims must explicitly prohibit interest in case of disputes, differences, delayed payments, or any other circumstance to restrict an arbitrator's power to award pendente lite interest. Clause 22, which merely prohibited the contractor from claiming interest on payments due, was insufficient to bar the arbitrator from awarding such interest. The Court reduced the pendente lite interest from 15% to 9% (matching the post-award interest already paid), applicable from December 18, 1991, to March 7, 1995, payable within 60 days, considering the time elapsed in litigation and amounts already paid by the respondent.
The SC held that under the Arbitration Act, 1940, a contractual clause barring interest claims must explicitly prohibit interest in case of disputes, differences, delayed payments, or any other circumstance to restrict an arbitrator's power to award pendente lite interest. Clause 22, which merely prohibited the contractor from claiming interest on payments due, was insufficient to bar the arbitrator from awarding such interest. The Court reduced the pendente lite interest from 15% to 9% (matching the post-award interest already paid), applicable from December 18, 1991, to March 7, 1995, payable within 60 days, considering the time elapsed in litigation and amounts already paid by the respondent.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.