Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
ITAT quashed the reopening of assessment under section 147 r.w.s. 148 of the Act due to fundamental procedural defects. The AO's reasons for reopening were deemed scanty, vague, and ambiguous, containing conflicting statements about alleged fictitious profit in equity/derivative trading and exempted Long Term Capital Gain. The Tribunal found no independent application of mind by the AO, who merely relied on received information without verifying transaction details, payment modes, or counterparties. Additionally, the PCIT's approval was determined to be mechanical rather than substantive, as it lacked recorded reasoning or satisfaction. The assessment was set aside due to both non-application of mind and invalid approval.
ITAT quashed the reopening of assessment under section 147 r.w.s. 148 of the Act due to fundamental procedural defects. The AO's reasons for reopening were deemed scanty, vague, and ambiguous, containing conflicting statements about alleged fictitious profit in equity/derivative trading and exempted Long Term Capital Gain. The Tribunal found no independent application of mind by the AO, who merely relied on received information without verifying transaction details, payment modes, or counterparties. Additionally, the PCIT's approval was determined to be mechanical rather than substantive, as it lacked recorded reasoning or satisfaction. The assessment was set aside due to both non-application of mind and invalid approval.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.