Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The ITAT directed exclusion of three companies (Wipro Limited, Infosys Ltd., and Tata Elexi Limited) as comparables for transfer pricing adjustments, relying on precedents from Delhi HC in Agnity India Technologies and Avaya India cases. Regarding interest on outstanding receivables from AEs, the Tribunal remanded the issue to AO/TPO to examine industry practices and any mutual payment agreements. The ITAT held that if receivables are within industry average holding periods or contractual terms, adjustment may not be warranted. The Tribunal found LIBOR plus 425 basis points excessive for computing interest, suggesting that a rate based solely on LIBOR would be more appropriate. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.
The ITAT directed exclusion of three companies (Wipro Limited, Infosys Ltd., and Tata Elexi Limited) as comparables for transfer pricing adjustments, relying on precedents from Delhi HC in Agnity India Technologies and Avaya India cases. Regarding interest on outstanding receivables from AEs, the Tribunal remanded the issue to AO/TPO to examine industry practices and any mutual payment agreements. The ITAT held that if receivables are within industry average holding periods or contractual terms, adjustment may not be warranted. The Tribunal found LIBOR plus 425 basis points excessive for computing interest, suggesting that a rate based solely on LIBOR would be more appropriate. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
