Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
ITAT set aside the Pr. CIT's revisional order under s.263, restoring the AO's reassessment order under s.147 r.w.s.144B. The Tribunal determined that the AO had arrived at a possible and plausible view regarding the taxpayer's eligibility for s.54B deduction after proper verification of agricultural use of the land. The Pr. CIT improperly substituted his own interpretation of ISRO satellite imagery and CCOST reports when the AO had already considered these alongside land revenue records, physical verification reports, and witness statements. The Tribunal held that revenue records evidencing agricultural use should be given precedence over satellite imagery, following Supreme Court precedent.
ITAT set aside the Pr. CIT's revisional order under s.263, restoring the AO's reassessment order under s.147 r.w.s.144B. The Tribunal determined that the AO had arrived at a possible and plausible view regarding the taxpayer's eligibility for s.54B deduction after proper verification of agricultural use of the land. The Pr. CIT improperly substituted his own interpretation of ISRO satellite imagery and CCOST reports when the AO had already considered these alongside land revenue records, physical verification reports, and witness statements. The Tribunal held that revenue records evidencing agricultural use should be given precedence over satellite imagery, following Supreme Court precedent.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.