Contingency expenses, exempt-income disallowance, and royalty benchmarking: unsupported adjustments were deleted under consistent accounting and trans...
Disciplinary proportionality requires penalties for Authorised Representative misconduct to match proven harm, leading to reconsideration of registrat...
The HC quashed the order under s.119(2)(b) and condoned the delay in filing income tax return for AY 2020-21, allowing the petitioner to claim refund belatedly. The court recognized genuine hardship faced by the non-resident petitioner who was prevented from filing returns due to COVID-19 travel restrictions and late deposit of TDS by the property purchaser (M/s. Ashutosh Builders) on 11.06.2022. The petitioner had already furnished income computation with long-term capital gain details in response to the tax authority's notice. The HC determined these circumstances constituted sufficient grounds for condonation of delay under the Income Tax Act provisions.
The HC quashed the order under s.119(2)(b) and condoned the delay in filing income tax return for AY 2020-21, allowing the petitioner to claim refund belatedly. The court recognized genuine hardship faced by the non-resident petitioner who was prevented from filing returns due to COVID-19 travel restrictions and late deposit of TDS by the property purchaser (M/s. Ashutosh Builders) on 11.06.2022. The petitioner had already furnished income computation with long-term capital gain details in response to the tax authority's notice. The HC determined these circumstances constituted sufficient grounds for condonation of delay under the Income Tax Act provisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4918 
