Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The HC quashed the order under s.119(2)(b) and condoned the delay in filing income tax return for AY 2020-21, allowing the petitioner to claim refund belatedly. The court recognized genuine hardship faced by the non-resident petitioner who was prevented from filing returns due to COVID-19 travel restrictions and late deposit of TDS by the property purchaser (M/s. Ashutosh Builders) on 11.06.2022. The petitioner had already furnished income computation with long-term capital gain details in response to the tax authority's notice. The HC determined these circumstances constituted sufficient grounds for condonation of delay under the Income Tax Act provisions.
The HC quashed the order under s.119(2)(b) and condoned the delay in filing income tax return for AY 2020-21, allowing the petitioner to claim refund belatedly. The court recognized genuine hardship faced by the non-resident petitioner who was prevented from filing returns due to COVID-19 travel restrictions and late deposit of TDS by the property purchaser (M/s. Ashutosh Builders) on 11.06.2022. The petitioner had already furnished income computation with long-term capital gain details in response to the tax authority's notice. The HC determined these circumstances constituted sufficient grounds for condonation of delay under the Income Tax Act provisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.