Blocked input tax credit for resort construction remains unavailable; interest follows actual utilisation, while delayed payment attracts statutory pe...
Duplicate PAN allocation requires record verification and deactivation reasons before assessment-related transactions can be attributed to an assessee...
Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required...
The HC held that the requirement to file a certified copy of an appealed order under GST Rules is procedural rather than mandatory. The petitioner had filed their appeal on 15.11.2022 with a copy of the order, before Rule 108 was amended on 16.12.2022. Following the Delhi HC decision in Chegg India Private Limited, the Court determined that when an appeal is filed with all necessary documents including a copy of the appealed order, a certified copy is not required. The Court ruled that the amendment to Rule 108 applies retrospectively as it is procedural in nature. The petition was allowed and the matter remanded to the Additional Commissioner (Appeal) for consideration on merits.
The HC held that the requirement to file a certified copy of an appealed order under GST Rules is procedural rather than mandatory. The petitioner had filed their appeal on 15.11.2022 with a copy of the order, before Rule 108 was amended on 16.12.2022. Following the Delhi HC decision in Chegg India Private Limited, the Court determined that when an appeal is filed with all necessary documents including a copy of the appealed order, a certified copy is not required. The Court ruled that the amendment to Rule 108 applies retrospectively as it is procedural in nature. The petition was allowed and the matter remanded to the Additional Commissioner (Appeal) for consideration on merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.