Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
CESTAT ruled against exemption under S.No. 12(a) of Notification No. 25/2012-ST for services provided to RDA and NRDA, finding both authorities were engaged in commercial activities with plots and townships sold at commercial rates. However, the Tribunal remanded the matter regarding S.No. 12(e) exemption for reservoirs, sumps, and pumping stations, clarifying that "plant" would include pumping stations and interconnected reservoirs/sumps. CESTAT also directed reexamination of NRDA services eligibility under S.No. 12(e). The Tribunal set aside the extended period of limitation and associated penalties, finding no deliberate misstatement or suppression. Appeals allowed by way of remand to the Original Sanctioning Authority.
CESTAT ruled against exemption under S.No. 12(a) of Notification No. 25/2012-ST for services provided to RDA and NRDA, finding both authorities were engaged in commercial activities with plots and townships sold at commercial rates. However, the Tribunal remanded the matter regarding S.No. 12(e) exemption for reservoirs, sumps, and pumping stations, clarifying that "plant" would include pumping stations and interconnected reservoirs/sumps. CESTAT also directed reexamination of NRDA services eligibility under S.No. 12(e). The Tribunal set aside the extended period of limitation and associated penalties, finding no deliberate misstatement or suppression. Appeals allowed by way of remand to the Original Sanctioning Authority.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
