Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT ruled in favor of the taxpayer, determining that fabrication charges received could not be treated as "fees for technical services" under Article 12(4)(a) of the India-Singapore DTAA. The Tribunal noted this was a recurring issue for the taxpayer across assessment years 2015-16 to 2020-21, with consistent favorable rulings. The ITAT rejected the Assessing Officer's application of 10% tax on these charges, holding that the receipts toward fabrication of bushings did not constitute fees for technical services under the treaty, as no royalty under Article 12(3) of the India-Singapore DTAA was received by the taxpayer.
The ITAT ruled in favor of the taxpayer, determining that fabrication charges received could not be treated as "fees for technical services" under Article 12(4)(a) of the India-Singapore DTAA. The Tribunal noted this was a recurring issue for the taxpayer across assessment years 2015-16 to 2020-21, with consistent favorable rulings. The ITAT rejected the Assessing Officer's application of 10% tax on these charges, holding that the receipts toward fabrication of bushings did not constitute fees for technical services under the treaty, as no royalty under Article 12(3) of the India-Singapore DTAA was received by the taxpayer.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4916 
