Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether fabrication charges received for refabrication or refurbishment of bushings were taxable as fees for technical services under section 9(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and Article 12 of the India-Singapore Tax Treaty.
Analysis: The payment was for fabrication activity carried out at the assessee's plant in Singapore and did not involve making available technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how or process to the Indian payer. The issue was covered by earlier Tribunal orders in the assessee's own case, which held that such receipts do not fall within Article 12(4)(a). The Tribunal followed those decisions and held that the treaty provision could not be invoked to tax the receipt as fees for technical services.
Conclusion: The fabrication charges were not taxable as fees for technical services, and the addition was deleted in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Refabrication or refurbishment charges are not fees for technical services where no technical knowledge, skill, know-how or process is made available to the payer and the payment does not satisfy the treaty conditions for taxation as technical services.