Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The HC quashed attachment orders dated 19.01.2013, 17.02.2014, and 01.05.2015 against directors' personal properties under the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003. Following precedent in MR Choksi, the court reiterated that corporate veil cannot be lifted without strong factual foundation, which was absent in this case. The court emphasized that personal properties of directors cannot be attached to secure company dues, as this issue is no longer res integra. The respondents failed to establish any basis for disregarding the company's separate legal personality to pursue directors personally. Petition allowed.
The HC quashed attachment orders dated 19.01.2013, 17.02.2014, and 01.05.2015 against directors' personal properties under the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003. Following precedent in MR Choksi, the court reiterated that corporate veil cannot be lifted without strong factual foundation, which was absent in this case. The court emphasized that personal properties of directors cannot be attached to secure company dues, as this issue is no longer res integra. The respondents failed to establish any basis for disregarding the company's separate legal personality to pursue directors personally. Petition allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
