Concessional penalty for search-disclosed unreconciled jewellery applies where substantive disclosure conditions are met despite omission from origina...
The ITAT partially allowed the taxpayer's appeal concerning comparable selection for transfer pricing adjustments. The Tribunal excluded Tata Elxsi Limited (significant intangibles owner), Persistent Systems Limited (diversified activities), Infosys Limited (brand value, R&D expenditure), Mindtree Limited (excessive onsite revenue), and Akshay Software Technologies Limited (ERP implementation services) as non-comparable to the assessee's captive software development services. However, the ITAT retained Larsen & Toubro Infotech Limited, Infobeans Technologies Limited, and Cybage Software Private Limited as valid comparables, rejecting the assessee's functional dissimilarity arguments. The Tribunal directed inclusion of Maveric Systems Limited and Harbinger Systems Pvt. Limited, finding them functionally similar despite R&D expenditure or database availability concerns.
The ITAT partially allowed the taxpayer's appeal concerning comparable selection for transfer pricing adjustments. The Tribunal excluded Tata Elxsi Limited (significant intangibles owner), Persistent Systems Limited (diversified activities), Infosys Limited (brand value, R&D expenditure), Mindtree Limited (excessive onsite revenue), and Akshay Software Technologies Limited (ERP implementation services) as non-comparable to the assessee's captive software development services. However, the ITAT retained Larsen & Toubro Infotech Limited, Infobeans Technologies Limited, and Cybage Software Private Limited as valid comparables, rejecting the assessee's functional dissimilarity arguments. The Tribunal directed inclusion of Maveric Systems Limited and Harbinger Systems Pvt. Limited, finding them functionally similar despite R&D expenditure or database availability concerns.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
