Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The ITAT partially allowed the taxpayer's appeal concerning comparable selection for transfer pricing adjustments. The Tribunal excluded Tata Elxsi Limited (significant intangibles owner), Persistent Systems Limited (diversified activities), Infosys Limited (brand value, R&D expenditure), Mindtree Limited (excessive onsite revenue), and Akshay Software Technologies Limited (ERP implementation services) as non-comparable to the assessee's captive software development services. However, the ITAT retained Larsen & Toubro Infotech Limited, Infobeans Technologies Limited, and Cybage Software Private Limited as valid comparables, rejecting the assessee's functional dissimilarity arguments. The Tribunal directed inclusion of Maveric Systems Limited and Harbinger Systems Pvt. Limited, finding them functionally similar despite R&D expenditure or database availability concerns.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
