Credit-note turnover adjustments preserve inverted-duty refunds, while ministerial re-computation does not constitute an impermissible appellate reman...
Revisional jurisdiction over export quota premium deductions requires both error and Revenue prejudice; a permissible assessment view cannot be displa...
The AT upheld the Provisional Attachment Order against appellant who facilitated illegal foreign remittances to Hong Kong using fraudulent import documentation. The appellant failed to discharge the burden of proof under s.8(1) of PMLA to demonstrate legitimate sources for the attached property, offering only unsubstantiated assertions. The tribunal affirmed that money laundering constitutes a continuing offense, and its prosecution applies regardless of when the predicate offense occurred. The AT rejected the appellant's arguments regarding retrospective application and procedural defects in non-communication of reasons for attachment. The tribunal concluded the attached properties were correctly identified as proceeds of crime or their equivalent value, and dismissed the appeal.
The AT upheld the Provisional Attachment Order against appellant who facilitated illegal foreign remittances to Hong Kong using fraudulent import documentation. The appellant failed to discharge the burden of proof under s.8(1) of PMLA to demonstrate legitimate sources for the attached property, offering only unsubstantiated assertions. The tribunal affirmed that money laundering constitutes a continuing offense, and its prosecution applies regardless of when the predicate offense occurred. The AT rejected the appellant's arguments regarding retrospective application and procedural defects in non-communication of reasons for attachment. The tribunal concluded the attached properties were correctly identified as proceeds of crime or their equivalent value, and dismissed the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.