Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
HC determined that moratorium period under IBC Section 14 must be excluded when calculating limitation period for restoration applications under CPC Order IX Rule 9. During moratorium (14.05.2018 to 28.11.2019), Ex-Directors/Management lacked legal authority to pursue civil litigation. Court rejected argument that moratorium applied only to proceedings against Corporate Debtor. Despite delay between IRP instructions (05.10.2018) and application filing (06.12.2018), Court condoned delay considering company's successful Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. Impugned order set aside, matter remanded to Trial Court for further proceedings. Appeal allowed with moratorium period exclusion principle established for restoration applications.
HC determined that moratorium period under IBC Section 14 must be excluded when calculating limitation period for restoration applications under CPC Order IX Rule 9. During moratorium (14.05.2018 to 28.11.2019), Ex-Directors/Management lacked legal authority to pursue civil litigation. Court rejected argument that moratorium applied only to proceedings against Corporate Debtor. Despite delay between IRP instructions (05.10.2018) and application filing (06.12.2018), Court condoned delay considering company's successful Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. Impugned order set aside, matter remanded to Trial Court for further proceedings. Appeal allowed with moratorium period exclusion principle established for restoration applications.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
