Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
ITAT remanded matters concerning discrepancies between Form 26AS receipts and ITR, and rejection of trading results back to AO for de novo consideration. Assessee failed to adequately explain mobilization advances and reconciliation differences. CIT(A)'s order was deemed cryptic and non-speaking regarding GP ratio mismatch. AO directed to re-examine gross profit after assessee provides documentary evidence. Assessee bears responsibility to substantiate claims during consequential proceedings. If assessee fails to respond to notices or provide required documentation, AO empowered to adjudicate based on available facts and law. Revenue's grounds allowed for statistical purposes.
ITAT remanded matters concerning discrepancies between Form 26AS receipts and ITR, and rejection of trading results back to AO for de novo consideration. Assessee failed to adequately explain mobilization advances and reconciliation differences. CIT(A)'s order was deemed cryptic and non-speaking regarding GP ratio mismatch. AO directed to re-examine gross profit after assessee provides documentary evidence. Assessee bears responsibility to substantiate claims during consequential proceedings. If assessee fails to respond to notices or provide required documentation, AO empowered to adjudicate based on available facts and law. Revenue's grounds allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.