Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
CESTAT determined reimbursed expenses received by a Customs House Agent (CHA) from clients are not includible in the taxable value for service tax assessment. Following SC's ruling in UOI v Intercontinental Consultants case, the tribunal held that Rule 5(1) of Service Tax Valuation Rules 2006 was ultra vires to Sections 66 and 67 of the Act. The expenses reimbursed to CHA, separate from the service fees on which service tax was already paid, cannot form part of the assessable value. The tribunal set aside the original order that had included such reimbursements in the taxable value, allowing the appellant's appeal and confirming that reimbursed expenses fall outside the scope of service tax valuation.
CESTAT determined reimbursed expenses received by a Customs House Agent (CHA) from clients are not includible in the taxable value for service tax assessment. Following SC's ruling in UOI v Intercontinental Consultants case, the tribunal held that Rule 5(1) of Service Tax Valuation Rules 2006 was ultra vires to Sections 66 and 67 of the Act. The expenses reimbursed to CHA, separate from the service fees on which service tax was already paid, cannot form part of the assessable value. The tribunal set aside the original order that had included such reimbursements in the taxable value, allowing the appellant's appeal and confirming that reimbursed expenses fall outside the scope of service tax valuation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
